{"id":140,"date":"2012-12-28T11:02:50","date_gmt":"2012-12-28T16:02:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dimitrithelover.com\/blog\/?p=140"},"modified":"2012-12-28T11:02:50","modified_gmt":"2012-12-28T16:02:50","slug":"dimitri-the-lovers-legal-service-for-toronto-real-men-members-and-saira-peeskers-interview-fail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/dimitrithelover.com\/blog\/dimitri-the-lovers-legal-service-for-toronto-real-men-members-and-saira-peeskers-interview-fail\/","title":{"rendered":"Dimitri The Lover’s legal service for Toronto Real Men members (and Saira Peesker’s interview FAIL)"},"content":{"rendered":"

As many of you know, I\u00a0offer free legal representation to Toronto Real Men members who are\u00a0accused of crimes related to the use or possession of a penis.\u00a0 I refer to this member benefit as “COCK INSURANCE”.\u00a0 I am very proud of the fact that I defend men’s right to KEEP AND BEAR COCK!\u00a0 For obvious reasons, the men that I represent on these matters usually want to keep a very low profile.\u00a0 Therefore,\u00a0I\u00a0had NEVER\u00a0publicized\u00a0my involvement in these\u00a0types of cases.<\/strong><\/p>\n

On\u00a0June 15, 2012, I represented my seduction student Pavel Shkolnik\u00a0in Centre Avenue Court, after a FemiNazi CUNT\u00a0reported him for “harassing” her on the subway.\u00a0 But unlike\u00a0all my other\u00a0clients, Pavel DEMANDED publicity, in order to make heterosexual men aware that they need not submit to the FemiNazis’ agenda\u00a0of psychological castration.\u00a0 Proud of his dedication to the cause and humbled by his total lack of shame, I announced the event here http:\/\/www.blogto.com\/events\/48604<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

We arrived at the courthouse early.\u00a0 The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) prosecutor had known me for several years, so we had a\u00a0good rapport.\u00a0 I demanded an adjournment\u00a0on two grounds.\u00a0 Firstly,\u00a0I had requested “full disclosure” from the TTC.\u00a0 That way my client and I would know what the TTC’s case was, thereby allowing us to properly prepare.\u00a0 The\u00a0cop’s notes\u00a0I received were\u00a0totally illegible, so I argued that the TTC\u00a0had failed to\u00a0provide me with adequate disclosure.\u00a0 I demanded that they supply me\u00a0with transcribed\u00a0notes.\u00a0 Secondly, I had no statement from the alleged “victim”, and even if I did, I\u00a0had the right\u00a0to interrogate\u00a0her one-on-one in a pre-trial.\u00a0 All that Pavel\u00a0remembered of the alleged incident\u00a0was that he “hit on some badly underfucked slut” and shortly thereafter was handed a citation.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

I\u00a0used my legal\u00a0acumen and charm to sway the\u00a0TTC prosecutor to\u00a0adjourn the matter\u00a0to a date in August, at which time they would present the “victim” to me for interrogation.\u00a0\u00a0The prosecutor\u00a0also agreed to have the cop provide me with typed notes.\u00a0 However, since neither the “victim” nor the TTC cop were present in the court when the case was finally called by the court clerk,\u00a0the matter\u00a0was dismissed, and my client walked, as described in this grossly biased article http:\/\/www.thegridto.com\/city\/local-news\/lovers-defence\/<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

As an aside, I found two facts\u00a0surrounding this case\u00a0very amusing.\u00a0 Firstly,\u00a0since the TTC is\u00a0for all intents and purposes a “Crown Corporation”,\u00a0it is owned by a CUNT by the name of Queen Elizabeth\u00a0(member of a family\u00a0who abducts Aboriginal children for rape and blood sacrifice).\u00a0 So the\u00a0papers served to Pavel\u00a0read “Regina vs Pavel Shkolnik”.\u00a0 I\u00a0crossed out “Regina” and changed it to “Vagina”, which I felt was\u00a0more\u00a0appropriate.\u00a0 I was rather disappointed that I did not have the opportunity to hand the altered documents\u00a0to the judge.\u00a0 Secondly, I am a pork-loving anti-Zionist Greek pagan, and my client Pavel is a strictly kosher\u00a0pro-Zionist Russian Jew.\u00a0 A Greek representing a Jew … talk about a role reversal!\u00a0 Pretty cool, huh?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anyway, a\u00a0few weeks\u00a0after the gridto article was published, a reporter\u00a0named Saira Peesker, who identified herself as being from\u00a0the online Marxist news collective Open File<\/em>, contacted\u00a0my manager to ask permission to interview me\u00a0regarding the legal services I provide to men.\u00a0 I generally do not\u00a0grant interviews, but if I am generous enough to make myself available for one, I take my role in it VERY SERIOUSLY and I put my whole heart into it.\u00a0 <\/strong>My security department\u00a0conducted extremely thorough\u00a0background research on\u00a0Miss Peesker.\u00a0 They found little evidence in the way of her being a FemiNazi, other than her participation in man-hating dyke-dominated\u00a0Roller Derby.\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

In future I will\u00a0post in-depth on the psychology of sluts who participate in Roller Derby.\u00a0 Briefly, most\u00a0players of the sport have repressed “daddy issues”, often times related to keeping their daddy out of their vagina.\u00a0 The game involves players who each represent a vulture-like sperm,\u00a0encircling a\u00a0large track representing\u00a0a femme lesbian’s vulva.\u00a0 All of the sperm on each team, with the exception of one, were\u00a0produced by a meddling faggot looking to knock up the\u00a0femme\u00a0with a\u00a0turkey baster.\u00a0 His motive is\u00a0to garner attention by way of bragging\u00a0rights and being the guest of honour at a\u00a0FABULOUS\u00a0baby shower.\u00a0 However, one\u00a0player on each team\u00a0represents a heterosexual sperm that landed “without consent”\u00a0on the femme’s vulva, after\u00a0a heterosexual\u00a0rapist tried to forcibly JAM it\u00a0into her\u00a0vagina (this player is called the “JAMMER”).\u00a0 The other players, who are often\u00a0diesel dykes with attitude, must BLOCK the\u00a0JAMMED sperm with their bodies\u00a0(these players\u00a0are called “BLOCKERS”).<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nonetheless,\u00a0my manager and I agreed to\u00a0Miss Peesker’s\u00a0interview.\u00a0 I granted her two emails … a first one\u00a0where she would present me with\u00a0initial questions, and a second one for follow-up questions based on my answers to her initial questions. For your information, here is Miss Peesker’s web site http:\/\/sairapeesker.com\/<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, to date no article has been\u00a0published …\u00a0and I doubt one ever will.\u00a0\u00a0You know why?\u00a0 As you will see from my answers to her questions\u00a0 (contained in\u00a0two separate emails I have cut and paste further down) I made it clear that\u00a0if\u00a0Open File<\/em>\u00a0did not\u00a0post MY FULL UNEDITED RESPONSES TO\u00a0MISS PEESKER’S QUESTIONS, and subsequently anything they published was purposely\u00a0taken out of context in order to misrepresent me, I would hold them LEGALLY LIABLE.\u00a0\u00a0In response, Miss Peesker\u00a0argued that\u00a0Open File<\/em>\u00a0needed to “edit” my responses because they had “space constraints”; but I knew that\u00a0there was\u00a0no way an\u00a0ONLINE\u00a0publication could have “space constraints”.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nonetheless, I stand by my security department’s vetting of Miss Peesker.\u00a0\u00a0I still believe that\u00a0she is\u00a0NOT a FemiNazi …\u00a0but it\u00a0appears that HER EDITOR IS!\u00a0 You see, we never vetted Chantal Braganza, the Toronto Editor for Open File.\u00a0 <\/em>It turns out that on further research we find that Mrs. Braganza has a web site in which she states “I like pickling vegetables, feminist history and movies about the end of the world.\u00a0 I live in Toronto with my husband and cat …”\u00a0 Googling her name reveals all sorts of juicy tidbits related to\u00a0FemiNazi\u00a0events\u00a0like “SlutWalk”.\u00a0 Your honour, I REST MY CASE!<\/strong><\/p>\n

The FemiNazi editor\u00a0most likely wanted to pull the old Marxist-FemiNazi switcheroo by\u00a0juxtaposing excerpts of\u00a0my answers in such a way that I\u00a0would look\u00a0like a total idiot.\u00a0\u00a0In addition, she likely wanted to find evidence that I was doing something “illegal” so that the Marxist news collective\u00a0could “expose” me to the authorities,\u00a0then send me up the river, FemiNazi style!\u00a0 Mrs. Braganza obviously asked\u00a0Miss Peesker to use her “womanly charms” to coax me into dropping my guard.\u00a0 But\u00a0unfortunately for them, I did not fall for it.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anyway, this whole fiasco has been an exercise in futility.\u00a0 Miss Peesker\u00a0spent a lot of time formulating questions for me,\u00a0and I\u00a0invested even more\u00a0time\u00a0in writing concise, detailed, thoughtful\u00a0answers to her questions.\u00a0 I\u00a0know that my readers would agree that there is no\u00a0point in Miss Peesker and I wasting\u00a0our combined efforts.\u00a0\u00a0Therefore, without further adieu,\u00a0please enjoy my answers\u00a0to\u00a0Saira Peesker’s\u00a0questions, split over two emails.<\/strong><\/p>\n

DIMITRI THE LOVER EMAIL RESPONSE<\/strong>\u00a0#1, AUGUST 4, 2012:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Saira:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Please find my answers to your questions below.\u00a0 You have my permission to publish my answers only if they are reprinted in full, without omission or insertion.\u00a0 Otherwise sentences could be taken out of context, and as such may change the meaning of my answers to the point where I would be mis-represented.\u00a0 If that happens it would make publishing the edited comments libelous and therefore open you to a law suit.\u00a0 In other words, cut and paste each of my answers WORD FOR WORD and you are fine.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As for openfile.ca, I am a big supporter of fifth estate journalism.\u00a0 However, I have noticed that your viewer stats have gradually eroded over the last few weeks … <\/strong>http:\/\/www.alexa.com\/siteinfo\/openfile.ca#<\/a> … let us see if we can reverse the trend with an interesting article on me.\u00a0 FYI, I was forwarded a copy of a dossier on you from our security department.\u00a0 What is with the “Roller Derby”?\u00a0 You definitely have some unresolved daddy issues!\u00a0 I can help you overcome them, but that is a project for a later date.\u00a0 Anyway, here are my answers to your questions …<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. To date how many people have you represented in court?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The acquittal of Mr. Pavel Shkolnik, a proud member of Toronto Real Men, represents my 26th court case.\u00a0 A few of the men I have represented were repeat customers, so I estimate I have had approximately 20 clients.\u00a0 Of course, I have excluded any times I represented myself or appeared in court to assist friends charged with minor offences such as nuisance bylaws arising out of Marxist social engineering, speeding or parking tickets, etc.<\/strong><\/p>\n

2. What sort of legal matters have you represented people on?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anything from sexual assault to criminal harassment.\u00a0 For example, in Mr. Shkolnik’s case an uptight FemiNazi cunt accused him of harassing her on the Toronto subway after he politely accosted her.\u00a0 Since Mr. Shkolnik’s taxes help to subsidize the subway system, he has the right to make it his sexual playground, provided he does not contravene any criminal laws.\u00a0 The charges against him were dropped because neither the subway cop nor the “victim” showed up.\u00a0 I’ve done medical-legal work for the Toronto Transit Commission in the past, assisting them in catching fraud artists who fake “slip and falls” on their property.\u00a0 They are well-aware of my legal acumen.\u00a0 Also, I scheduled a pretrial to give me an opportunity to interrogate the “victim”, demanded to know her name and contact information, and requested transcribed copies of the officer’s illegible notes.\u00a0 No one in the history of the TTC had ever demanded a pretrial on this type of offence.\u00a0 My suspicion is that the TTC feared if I won in court, it would set a legal precedent and open the floodgates for men to aggressively approach sluts on the subway.\u00a0 It was safer for them to just drop the matter.\u00a0 It is kind of like baseball.\u00a0 Similar to how a strong batter is walked to prevent a home run, I suspect that the TTC in essence “walked” me and Mr. Shkolnik by telling both the cop and the “victim” to stay home.<\/strong><\/p>\n

3. What sort of clients do you represent and how do they find you?<\/strong><\/p>\n

I only represent personal friends and members of Toronto Real Men, the world’s only anti-metrosexual organization.\u00a0 In the case of Toronto Real Men, we provide every member with what we refer to as “cock insurance”.\u00a0 Basically, if the man is ever charged with a crime related to the use or possession of a cock, then he is entitled to free legal representation by me.\u00a0 My motto is that I defend a man’s right to KEEP AND BEAR COCK!<\/strong><\/p>\n

4. What have the outcomes been?<\/strong><\/p>\n

In 100% of cases I have garnered either an acquittal or the withdrawal of all charges, such as in the case of Mr. Shkolnik.<\/strong><\/p>\n

5. Is it legal to represent someone else in court while not being a lawyer or licensed paralegal, and if so, how?<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you peruse the ZioFascist-inspired provincial statute governing lawyers and paralegals you will see that it is PERFECTLY LEGAL to represent anyone you want, provided you are doing so as an unpaid friend OR on behalf of a member of a group such as a trade union (in my case the “union” is “The Brotherhood of Vaginal Miners”).\u00a0 Since my services are covered under the men’s “cock insurance”, they never pay me directly.\u00a0 However, there are perfectly legal ways in which I could be financially compensated for court appearances on behalf of the general public without contravening the statute, but I am not at liberty to disclose them here.<\/strong><\/p>\n

6. How did you first get into offering legal services?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Over the years I learned that most lawyers and paralegals are incompetent … REALLY FUCKING INCOMPETENT!\u00a0 They are high-priced paper pushers, with the laziest of the bunch hiring a team of legal assistants to do their paperwork while they sit back in their chair, download porn, and wait to be presented with papers to blindly sign.\u00a0 Put 99% of these borderline IQ shysters in court and they fold up faster than a metrosexual on a date with a cock-hungry coke whore.\u00a0 And do not get me started on the paralegals.\u00a0 Some of the dirtiest Eastern European skanks I have ever met called themselves “paralegals”.\u00a0 They knew how to fill in the blanks on a client’s immigration form or incorporation papers, or sucked a couple of lawyers’ cocks, and voila, they were granted status in the legal system.\u00a0 What a fucking joke!\u00a0 When I founded Toronto Real Men in 1995 I met several men who were victims of this type of incompetent legal representation, so I decided to include “cock insurance” in our benefits.<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. Do you have any formal legal training? <\/strong>If not, how did you develop the expertise to successfully represent clients in court?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Over the years I have represented myself in court on dozens of matters.\u00a0 For example, many years ago a lying cunt accused me of “sexually assaulting” her.\u00a0 She concocted a fantastic story about me aggressively groping her during a late night workplace visit while I was making the rounds as a housecall doctor.\u00a0 I hired a criminal lawyer, Louie Genova, who was quite good but very expensive.\u00a0 So I only retained him to run the preliminary hearing during which I carefully observed him and took notes.\u00a0 He subsequently gave me some pointers on court etiquette & procedural rules.\u00a0 Then I was on my own.\u00a0 I ran the entire jury trial myself.\u00a0 It was almost as exciting as my first fuck … but the trial lasted way longer!\u00a0 They lined up the prospective jurors for me like they were being marched in front of a firing squad.\u00a0 I chose …<\/strong><\/p>\n